DC vs RF vs Fiber Deep Engrave Resolution On Stone

1 min read·Updated Jul 2024
Applies toAll machinesTopicGeneral

THIS DOCUMENT IS IN PROCESS. CHECK BACK OFTEN!


This was my first time using the multi-cam 'live production' workflow with a remote so please excuse my excessive use of 'uh' as well as all of the other hiccups :) 


This test will be done on stone samples on both a Nova 35-80 DC tube machine, as well as an Odin 22-25 RF source machine. We are testing for speed, depth, resolution, etc... from each machine to determine the best machine for these materials.


Part 1 - Initial testing to verify if deep engraving is possible on Nova 35:



Part 2 - substrates react quite differently from one another on Nova 35:



Part 3 - after a second look, the results on the darker sample is not that bad. 




Part 4 - The artwork is often the cause of output anomalies, an can often be optimized, so I wanted to have a look at the provided graphic.



Part 5 - The next step was to do some of this on Odin 22 30w RF, but it was taken out to make room for a fiber (and on Odin 32 60w RF!!!), so I wanted to see what the Aurora 20w Fiber Galvo would do.




Part 6 - Here is a USB scope comparison of the outputs of the Nova 35-80 and the Aurora Fiber. , This sample is one of the hardest to dial in. And the fiber is only a day old and I had ZERO idea what I was doing. I'm sure we can dial this stuff in!



MORE TO COME. RF testing will begin once Odin 32 lands.

Still stuck?

Fastest response times in the industry from our US-based support team.